On Friday 21 October 2011, the Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York handed down an important decision, confirming that foreign (groups of) companies can use Chapter 11 without any significant threshold as to their nexus with the United States. This may be good news for corporates that seek to use Chapter 11 for restructuring their business or capital structure.
It is now clear that even very limited property in the U.S. is sufficient to qualify for a reorganisation through Chapter 11.
The Supreme Court recently issued an interesting ruling in an insolvency case where receivables that had been validly pledged to a bank were unlawfully collected by a bankruptcy trustee. The question was whether the damages claim of the bank against the bankrupt estate would take priority over the foreclosure and settlement costs, including the bankruptcy trustee’s salary.
Dutch insolvency practice is increasingly looking for possibilities to effectively restructure failing companies rather than liquidate them in order to safeguard creditors’ interests, and preserve jobs and economic activity. In line with international developments, pre-packs are on the rise and consultation on a bill to regulate pre-packs is currently on-going.
De Hoge Raad heeft recent uitgesproken dat bij het stellen van zekerheid in het kader van het aangaan van een nieuwe kredietrelatie geen bewijsvermoeden geldt dat betrokken partijen wetenschap van benadeling hadden. Dit maakt het in beginsel niet eenvoudig een dergelijke zekerheidsstelling te vernietigen op grond van de faillissementspauliana.
The Dutch Supreme Court on 11 July 2014 handed down a decision that improves the position of licensees in case of bankruptcy of a Dutch licensor, and of other parties deriving a right of use from a Dutch counterparty that goes bankrupt.
In recent years Dutch banks have established a practice of creating undisclosed rights of pledge (stil pandrecht) on all current and future receivables of their borrowers in an easy way and without the borrower's involvement. In the Supreme Court's ruling of 3 February 2012 (HR 3 February 2012, LJN BT6947), this practice was unsuccessfully put to the test by a bankruptcy trustee, who contested the alleged right of pledge of ING Bank on receivables of its bankrupt client.